> On Nov 12, 2018, at 4:53 PM, George Neuner <gneun...@comcast.net> wrote: > > I agree re: *explaining* the behavior in the browser. I don't necessarily > agree that either side needs continuations in order to *implement* the > behavior. Nor do I agree that persisted continuations are the best way to do > it. > > I am happy to be persuaded, but I seriously doubt you can do it.
I didn’t say that. > > >> Since most PLs do not support first-class continuations, programmers of >> interactive web-server plugins to manually encode this flow of control, >> which is done via partial CPS conversion. > > Examples? Program any interactive CGI script with an interaction within a loop or something and you’re forced to invert control flow. That’s a form of CPSing. > Full stack web development is a multi-discipline area that demands a high > level of knowledge and skill to architect a working application. IMO, the > vast majority of all web developers are not qualified to be doing it. Amen. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
