Yes, PRs for this sort of thing would definitely be welcome. Sam
On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 6:44 PM, Winston Weinert <winston+...@ml1.net> wrote: > I was perusing the Racket organization GitHub and noticed many of the repos > do not have descriptions, URLs, and READMEs. > > I think this would be nice if each Racket package had a README with a link > to the documentation (on r-l.org) and maybe a copy-paste from the > scribblings of its synopsis. > > Would PRs for this sort of thing be welcome? I am not familiar with how the > various repos are managed, and don't want to create needless noise :) > > Best, > Winston Weinert > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
