On 19/02/18 17:39, Ben Greenman wrote: > Hi Paulo, > > I hope you try using Typed Racket. If the performance turns out to be > a problem, we can try to help. > > > Here are some other experiences that people have shared on the list: > > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/racket-users/rfM6koVbOS8/klVzjKJ9BgAJ > > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/racket-users/6KQxpfMLTn0/lil_6qSMDAAJ > > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/racket-users/oo_FQqGVdcI/p4-bqol5hV4J > > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/racket-users/oo_FQqGVdcI/leUnIAn7yqwJ >
Hi Ben, Thanks for the shared links. That's very useful. I am at a point where I feel I need typed racket and yet I am in the world of squeezing performance wherever possible, therefore moving to typed racket will have to be a process done in parallel to normal product development. However, as I move from the untyped to the typed world, it will be interesting to see how the benchmarks I have fluctuate in time spent computing. I might not be able to start this work before April/May time as I am in the middle of a large delivery cycle but I will certainly get to it. I will keep you posted. -- Paulo Matos -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
