On Tuesday, September 5, 2017 at 10:57:17 AM UTC+3, Jay McCarthy wrote: > I've just tested on Linux and OS X and I don't see that behavior. I'm > quite confused.
Yes, scratch what I said. The "many-places" benchmark only fails this way for me on a particular Linux VM, which just so happened to be the one I was testing it on. Maybe I got the VM in a bad state. If the problem is meaningfully related to the benchmarked application, I'll follow up on it. Meanwhile, here are some benchmark results for "many-places". The transferred data sizes suggest it worked correctly. ====== results/custom-many-places.txt:Requests per second: 4931.29 [#/sec] (mean) results/custom-many.txt:Requests per second: 6449.73 [#/sec] (mean) results/custom-places.txt:Requests per second: 7325.81 [#/sec] (mean) results/custom-single.txt:Requests per second: 7793.91 [#/sec] (mean) ====== I'll try this again with two fixed cores available to the application container. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
