Dear Racket Users, I’ve noticed the following procedure calls don’t return (on my 64 bit Mac hardware):
(range (- 1 1e-16) 1.0 1e-17) (range 0 1 0) While (2) is obvious, (1) tripped me up (as I hadn’t noticed my step size had fallen to effectively zero). A small tweak to for.rkt in the racket distribution could trap the condition of an actually or effectively zero step. for.rkt already traps the condition where step is not real. If this makes sense, could one of the authors consider adding the tweak? Or is there a reason for leaving it alone? Kind regards, Tim Tim Jervis http://timjervis.com/ <http://timjervis.com/> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
