nanogenmo is the annual challenge of writing a computer program that generates a novel. It's kind of like nanowrimo only instead of writing a novel yourself, you write a computer program that does so.
You might find it interesting to google nanogenmo and look through their annual websites. There's some interesting stuff being done there. https://nanogenmo.github.io/ and their off-season mailing list: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/generativetext It isn't about generating sentences per se, but it is definitey a related subject. Some of them are sampling online databases of text with various algorithms, but the ones closest to your interests are using formal logic to develop plots and generating sentences hased on these deductions. -- hendrik On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 10:24:02AM +0100, Nguyen Linh Chi wrote: > Sorry but can i just ask this question, because this is out of my thinking > capacity (i have very little knowledge of computer stuff) > > The program of lab 7 is to generate pseudo-natural sentences. It's not > interactive in the sense that i cannot talk to it. I can only tell it to > say-something and it says something based on its data history. > > I was wondering, in which way i can make a program that response to what i > say. like a chatbot. what is the simplest version of a chat bot. > > should i give it conversations, telling which sentence is the initiator, > which is the responder? > then storing the sentences by breaking them down using the same structure > as a writing style (so a sentence is the smallest unit of a writing style). > > when i say something, the program will try to comprehend my sentence by > comparing it with its database. if it finds a roughly similar sentence, it > get the responder sentence to respond to me. > > i dont know. just asking, if anyone has any idea or simple solution for > beginner? > > > > > > On Feb 26, 2017 21:47, "Nguyen Linh Chi" <nguyenlinhch...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Oh my goodness, it is real. > > I was really thinking that if i truly tried to generate such a paper, > probably they would not notice. > > On Feb 26, 2017 02:01, "Matthew Butterick" <m...@mbtype.com> wrote: > > > > > On Feb 25, 2017, at 1:33 PM, Linh Chi Nguyen <nguyenlinhch...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > anyway, when being asked to say-something, the machine generates quite > > good sentences. i have this secret hope [0] that if i feed it enough game > > theory literature, somehow it can generate something of value for my phd > > thesis =)) because i'm so stuck. > > > > > > > > The champion in this category is SCIgen [1], which AFAIK has not been > > ported to Racket. [2] > > > > > > [1] https://pdos.csail.mit.edu/archive/scigen/ > > > > [2] https://github.com/strib/scigen > > > > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
