I find PP to be a useful tool for thinking about programming, but not terribly significant in everyday use -- my code will typically end up as a mixture of functional, declarative, procedural, and OO. The fact that Racket makes it easy to mix all of these is one of its many appeals.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Karn Kallio <tierplusplusli...@skami.org> wrote: > > With regards to programming paradigms, there are people who have > studied programming language pedagogy and language design who seem to > use them, for example Peter Van Roy > > www.info.ucl.ac.be/~pvr/VanRoyChapter.pdf > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
