Am Donnerstag, 19. Januar 2017 17:17:18 UTC+1 schrieb Matthias Felleisen: > In case my CPSing obscured the prose, here is what I said: > > What I am really saying is that I supplemented the proposal with a research > challenge that is common in the Racket world. If you are here and you see the > blueprints for paradise over there, don’t just build paradise. Also build the > bridge from here to there.
Just as a lurker into Racket for now - Is that really sensible? Always? I understand that the Racket culture might strongly lean into that but then ... As far as I understand Haskell was breaking compatibility now then to add new languae features. This enabled the fast iteration (albeit a painful one). On the other hand F# is the exact opposite - not only looking to remain compatible to itself but also to the rest of the .NET eco system (and C#). All of that makes the progress of the language pretty slow (from my POV) and creates lots of warts that are not necessary if you are not into C#. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
