> On Dec 27, 2016, at 1:57 PM, Robby Findler <[email protected]> > wrote: > > The main thing I worry about is that there are standard conventions > that we're missing from other language families. Would someone mind > investigating a few other, popular languages
FWIW Racket's own `~r` function already accepts radixes (radices? radishes?) up to 36. Personally I'm a fan of base 62 (used in short-URL generators, such as that employed by beautifulracket.com <http://beautifulracket.com/>). [1] https://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/strings.html?q=~x#%28def._%28%28lib._racket%2Fformat..rkt%29._~7er%29%29 <https://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/strings.html?q=~x#(def._((lib._racket/format..rkt)._~7er))> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
