I missed this thread when it first went by. I backup the pasterack db occasionally and I don't delete pastes, other than illegal stuff as determined by a nightly script. But the redis db only writes to disk every so often so some pastes could get lost. (Ironically the links in question are no longer available, sorry.)
I plan to maintain pasterack indefinitely and it could definitely use some discoverability improvements. I havent had time to work on it much these days though but I'm happy to hand the keys over if someone else is interested in improving it. On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Laurent <laurent.ors...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Tim Brown <t...@cityc.co.uk> wrote: >> >> 3 is not as necessary as “ownership” -- http://pasterack.org/pastes/31401 >> is >> a work in progress of http://pasterack.org/pastes/1055 ; I don’t want to >> verion control it, but I _do_ want to delete #31401. But it needs to be >> verifiably me that can do that. [Others might be more professional about >> life and want to properly version control their snippets]; I think this >> goes >> a against the spirit on anonymity of a “paste bin” > > > A simpler approach would be to track the fork tree instead, so that at least > one knows there are other, possibly better variants of one snippet. > Currently we can only see the parent snippet, not the children it seems. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
