At Mon, 5 Dec 2016 10:19:03 -0700, Matthew Flatt wrote: > There's a pending issue of making sure that `for` loops or other things > are not needlessly instrumented, since they're only part of the > expansion instead of the original code. We haven't gotten back to that, > but I bet it would help with your program.
We got back to that over the past week, so you could try a snapshot version of Racket to see if errortrace now works better for your application. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
