At Wed, 7 Dec 2016 12:01:24 -0800 (PST), Dan Liebgold wrote: > On Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 5:00:47 PM UTC-8, Robby Findler wrote: > > > > Perhaps there is another way to achieve the effect you want in a way > > that is more friendly to creating .zo files? > > > > Yes, this is the crux of the issue. In my case I have a system that deals > with > modules that may or may not have .zo files. I'm try to parameterize something > at compile time for generating the .zo and also at dynamic-require time (when > the required module may or may not have the corresponding .zo file). > > The best solution would be to simplify the compile-time logic such that the > parameterization isn't required... until then I may have to fix the system > to > parameterize the phases separately.
As a last resort, you might be able to use `dynamic-require-for-syntax`, which will let you grab a phase-1 value (such as a parameter) for use in phase-0 code. The `dynamic-require-for-syntax` function is a bad idea, but maybe it's useful in the short run. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
