On Monday, October 24, 2016 at 2:07:16 PM UTC-7, Ryan Culpepper wrote: > > It might make sense for syntax-parse to offer something like Redex's > `variable-not-otherwise-mentioned`, which would behave like you > expected. I think it would have to be a baked-in special case, but it > might be useful enough to justify that. >
I'm trying using keywords (i.e. changing 'blend' to '#:blend'). It'll also help the readability of this DSL, since it's already quite Racket-like. The only issue is converting our mountain of code that uses the old syntax (more than 40,000 lines, if you can believe it). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
