> On Oct 21, 2016, at 14:00, Jack Firth <jackhfi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> If you'd still like to use yaml, I would like to quietly point out that each 
> of the following is a valid boolean value in yaml:
> 
> - true
> - false
> - yes
> - no
> - y
> - n
> - True
> - False
> - TRUE
> - FALSE
> - on
> - off
> - YES
> - NO

Yes, that’s pretty much the final nail in the coffin. I’m starting to recognize 
that some of the initial appeal of YAML was due to DWIM that is almost certain 
to later come back to bite me. Looks like I’m stuck with sexps, json, or … 
wait, I could just roll my own parser! Wouldn’t take a second!

…

Just kidding.

Many thanks for the input.

John


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to