I sometimes use a trivial macro when a list would be more convenient than 
multiple values:

(define-syntax-rule (values->list expr)
  (call-with-values (λ () expr) list))

On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 1:02:35 PM UTC-5, Sanjeev Sharma wrote:
> if only grammar could does what I need .... dang
> 
> > 
> > let-values is does what I need
> > 
> >

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to