On Tuesday, July 12, 2016 at 8:20:55 PM UTC-7, m4burns wrote: > Hi all, > > I remember this topic came up on the list a while back. I've made a > Docker image of the latest Racket from alpine 3.3 with just musl libc. I > had to monkey patch some Racket internals to get this working, so it > might be badly and subtly broken. Feedback is appreciated! > > Dockerfile etc.: https://github.com/m4burns/racket-docker > Docker repo: https://hub.docker.com/r/m4burns/racket/ > > The size is a little bit of an improvement over Jack Firth's images (35 > vs 22 mb). I'm not sure it's worth the uncertainty of using musl instead > of glibc. > > Enjoy! > > Marc
This is fantastic! I'm glad somebody figured out how to do this. Those more familiar with Racket's internals can comment on what implications using musl has, but if you'd like to get more confidence in the installation's correctness I recommend installing and testing a majority of packages in the package catalog. I'd be glad to include this in my DockerHub image repo. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
