On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 5:30 PM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> IIUC, it sounds like both you and Sam are suggesting the same
>> thing. I think this *could* cause backward incompatibility for the
>> *probably empty* set of handin checkers that use tests for
>> non-transparent exceptions, but I’m happy to make this change if it
>> makes sense to you guys.
>
> But don't those programs break now, with the error that led you to
> originally start this discussion?
[FWIW, yes, I'm completely with Sam -- including this confusion.]
--
((x=>x(x))(x=>x(x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
