On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
<sa...@cs.indiana.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 5:30 PM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users
> <racket-users@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>>
>> IIUC, it sounds like both you and Sam are suggesting the same
>> thing. I think this *could* cause backward incompatibility for the
>> *probably empty* set of handin checkers that use tests for
>> non-transparent exceptions, but I’m happy to make this change if it
>> makes sense to you guys.
>
> But don't those programs break now, with the error that led you to
> originally start this discussion?
[FWIW, yes, I'm completely with Sam -- including this confusion.]
--
((x=>x(x))(x=>x(x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
