On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 15:55:34 -0500, Matthew Flatt wrote: > In the same way that properties can now be attached as preserved or > not, we could and an option for specifying whether properties are are > propagated/merged or not. If it's useful, we could even allow a > combining function to be associated with with either a property value > or a property key --- although a general combining function wouldn't > work with a preserved property. Any thoughts on those details?
That's starting to sound a bit like attribute grammars. Vincent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.