On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 06:45:01 +1000, Daniel Prager <daniel.a.pra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Thanks George > >Of interest to me is that you eschew the use of syntax-parse / -case / >-rules in favour of a straight syntax->datum -> straight racket -> >datum->syntax solution. I suppose this approach trades away hygiene and >error-checking for simplicity. I have more conventional syntax-rules macros that are mostly for dealing with the boiler-plate involved in database connections and transactions. I only recently learned about syntax-parse but I haven't tried it yet. Racket has so many features you could spend your life just learning the distribution. [Only partly jest] >* * * >I have a similar in spirit (but less sophisticated) macro that embeds >mustache-style templating in sxml in conjunction with Jens's Urlang JS >replacement in conjunction with Neil's html-writing library. Nice! George -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
