> No. Racket's evaluation model doesn't include the notion of an > allocation stack that is associated with a continuation. > > You could implement some form of stack manually, but heap allocation > (especially as managed by the GC) is usually the way to go.
I see, so Racket only stores a reference. However we still need to use the union-ptr procedure when using the union as a pointer parameter in a foreign function, right? Why is that? Thank you again for your previous reply. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
