On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Robby Findler
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Can you explain the use case a little bit more, please? This is the
> *SL languages?
No, a plain #lang with the syntactic code coverage enabled.
> They run their program, they see black/orange, they add tests, they no
> longer see black/orange, and they are confused?
Yes exactly -- and that's after I mention it in class and describe it in
the course pages.
> Did they not understand what black/orange means or were they expecting
> entirely black?
I think that by the time they work hard to cover everything and the
coverage colors disappear they quickly jump to a conclusion that
something is wrong. -- I even have the server report to them about
uncovered code, but even that doesn't help.
In case it wasn't clear -- this is not too important, just something
that strikes me as weird every time another student gets confused.
--
((x=>x(x))(x=>x(x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
