Nota Poin wrote on 02/12/2016 10:41 PM:
This does almost exactly what I was thinking about! Looking at the code makes me go cross-eyed,
Yes, I recommend not looking at the code. IIRC, the code is a little icky for a few reasons: 1. It was initially not as clear as I like, just because of the nature of how it worked, and because I was figuring it out. 2. We didn't yet have submodules, which are a godsend for working with Racket's phases, especially how I prefer to work, with one file per package, with inline docs&tests. 3. I did a big reworking to facilitate some optimizations for using this with the Racket Web Server specifically, which complicated things and left a lot of placeholders for further changes. But then all my packages stalled around the time of the new package system work, so it's in a half-finished state, and without a cleanup pass (though it should work).
Neil V. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
