I'm fixing pr 15227 but I would like to do so in a backwards-incompatible way.
Right now an out-of-range index is sometimes allowed as an argument to in-vector, leading to the bug: $ racket Welcome to Racket v6.4.0.4. -> (for/sum ([x (in-vector (vector 10 20) 2 -1 -1)]) x) SIGSEGV MAPERR si_code 1 fault on addr 0x180 Aborted >From what I can tell, the out-of-range index is allowed to enable this program: (in-vector (vector) 0 0) I want to change in-vector so that the starting index is always a valid vector-ref. The above program would become illegal. >From what I gather, the above program is allowed so that in-vector mimics in-range but I don't think this makes sense either if it means allowing out-of-range indices for the former. Any objections? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
