On Tuesday, January 5, 2016 at 2:12:44 PM UTC-5, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > Late but I want to record principles and experiences in this thread: >
> I don't understand this bullet. Bullet 1 says your code is now completely > typed. Our experience is that completely typed versions are about as fast and > on many occasions (eg., numeric) faster than completely untyped versions. > Yes, it was hybrid and is still, although today I made quite a few conversions where the cost/benefit (all mental cost/benefit, not speed) was conducive. This project is 40 files, 17 of which are hybrid with untyped code in submodules. I started this Typed Racket in mid-December, but I'm getting there. My feeling is that I rather like making small modules with typed borders but sometimes untyped implementations. I look forward to seeing future performance improvements in these hybrids. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
