I like yours better. I wrote mine that way because I thought there were going to be feedback loops and I had to run to a fixed point, like real hardware. But it never seems to generate circuits like that.
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Matthew Butterick <m...@mbtype.com> wrote: > An adaptation of Jay's solution that turns every wire into a function that > you can evaluate in the REPL. Plus: shorter. And dumber. Or cleverer? Thin > line. > > https://gist.github.com/mbutterick/bc24a6291081b1ce0f31 > > > > > On Saturday, December 19, 2015 at 11:53:52 AM UTC-8, Daniel Prager wrote: >> Thanks! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I will study and return with questions. >> >> >> Dan > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Jay McCarthy Associate Professor PLT @ CS @ UMass Lowell http://jeapostrophe.github.io "Wherefore, be not weary in well-doing, for ye are laying the foundation of a great work. And out of small things proceedeth that which is great." - D&C 64:33 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
