Unfortunately, I need something else, because my semantics is highly non-deterministic, and I want to be able to see only paths, which lead to a certain term.
BR, Anton Podkopaev 2015-12-18 20:49 GMT+03:00 Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu>: > I think you may want to call apply-reduction-relation* with a > #:stop-when argument instead? > > Robby > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 5:33 AM, Anton Podkopaev <podkoav...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hello, colleagues! > > > > Is there any way to get a term trace from successful test-->>E in Redex? > > > > BR, > > Anton Podkopaev, PhD student, SPbSU > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Racket Users" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
