After having a silly runtime error of a missing argument, I wondered why arity wasn't checked (on hash-ref in my case).
Looking through old thread started by Roman Klochkov, I saw the answer to his and my identical question on arity checks. I changed my logging to show in Dr Racket and included warnings on the list. My immediate problem is solved. My suggestion is that having a default of showing GC collection but not showing probable arity errors is misplaced. For me, the GC information is noise. However, the arity check is very pertinent. I understand that I can change the setting and I have. However, I suspect that a review of those defaults would better assist the audience that is unlikely to have modified defaults. Thanks for a wonderful environment. John Griffin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
