Going briefly off-topic for Racket...

Definitely be encouraged to experiment in the "IoT" network-connected device space, as hobbyists, DIYers, or researchers. But be very careful with big IoT investments. Also be skeptical of current off-the-shelf IoT products and specs, for security- or safety-sensitive purposes.

I've looked a bit at ZigBee (including HA), Z-Wave, and proprietary WiFi-based approaches in practice recently (that was why I packaged Racket for OpenWRT). I haven't looked at MQTT, nor the Google yet-another-protocol.

Besides functional and security issues (which I won't get into here), there are two huge political problems affecting most IoT efforts:

* Many/most companies are focused on land-grabbing the potentially massive new commercial space, with a foothold/stranglehold trumping all other considerations.

* There is a general industry desire to extend the pervasive industry snooping that now happens on the Web and on smartphones/tablets, to include traditionally non-networked things in the home, in the car, and in public spaces.

Again, hobby/DIY and research activities are good. But don't be misled by MBAs who look at the term "Internet of Things" and see only the market capitalization of Apple, Google, and Facebook. If you're going to do serious work in this space, even non-commercially, I suspect you'll probably soon find it helpful to understand something of the commercial maneuvers, more than in many other technical spaces.

Neil V.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to