A fresh syntax wouldn't have to worry about breaking old code. I've written at least two variations on a new `defn` and/or `def` syntax [1][2]. I bet other people have, too.
That topic could be its own long thread. It would probably include many good ideas. Of course it would probably become a "Racket 2" thread. :) Having written variations, have I used them extensively in code I've shared with other people? No. Why? Partly I think it goes to Neil's point about preferring a community consensus for basics. [1]: https://github.com/greghendershott/def-jambda [2]: https://github.com/greghendershott/defn -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
