On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 05:48:17AM +0200, Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:34 PM, Neil Van Dyke <n...@neilvandyke.org> wrote: > > Alex Knauth wrote on 10/14/2015 04:37 PM: > >> > >> You can use > >> #lang colon-kw racket > >> for :kw syntax, and > >> #lang kw-colon racket > >> for kw: syntax. > > > > > > If the standard `#lang racket` and `#lang racket/base` don't support > > `:keyword` out of the box -- but instead some alternative reader or forked > > #lang is required -- then we would expect error messages about `:keyword` > > not working to be an FAQ on the email list. That's one intuitive example of > > the kinds of problems that arise. > > But supporting this out of the box in #lang racket would invalidate > existing racket programs, no?
I'd like to ask: What do the Scheme standards say about this? What do Lisp standards say about this? I don't know the answers to these questons, though maybe I should, and Racket is not a standard Scheme, but I think these answers should at least guide us. -- hendrik -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
