What about "find-min-by"/"find-max-by"? (Or, if it's more standard
Rackety style, "find-min/by" and "find-max/by", where the slash
denotes a variant of an otherwise common function...) Ben On 10/11/2015 6:24 PM, Alex Knauth
wrote:
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. |
- [racket-users] Naming for generalization of find-min an... Alex Knauth
- Re: [racket-users] Naming for generalization of fi... Robby Findler
- Re: [racket-users] Naming for generalization of fi... Andrew Kent
- Re: [racket-users] Naming for generalization o... Alex Knauth
- Re: [racket-users] Naming for generalizati... Matthias Felleisen
- Re: [racket-users] Naming for generali... Alexis King
- [racket-users] Re: Naming for generalization of fi... JCG
- Re: [racket-users] Naming for generalization of fi... Ben Lerner
- Re: [racket-users] Naming for generalization of fi... Matthias Felleisen
- Re: [racket-users] Naming for generalization of fi... Alex Knauth
- Re: [racket-users] Naming for generalization o... Robby Findler
- Re: [racket-users] Naming for generalizati... Daniel Prager
- Re: [racket-users] Naming for generali... Vincent St-Amour
- Re: [racket-users] Naming for gen... Greg Hendershott
- Re: [racket-users] Naming for... Robby Findler
- Re: [racket-users] Naming for... Matthew Butterick
- Re: [racket-users] Naming for... Alex Knauth
- Re: [racket-users] Naming for... Alexis King