On 10/07/2015 10:19 AM, Brian Adkins wrote: > If I instead call: (atanh (number->float-complex -2)) I do get a > complex result.
I was surprised to see that (atanh (make-rectangular -2 0)) => +nan.0. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
