On Saturday, October 3, 2015 at 1:41:57 PM UTC+2, Neil Van Dyke wrote: > I always use `#lang racket/base`, since I'm almost always writing > reusable modules, and I'd like for a hypothetical someone reusing the > module in the future to not have to pull in all the `#lang racket` > dependencies.
As a new programmer always using #lang racket: what's the overhead from using it instead of racket/base? Is name lookup during compilation slower? Documentation mentions "load time"... but if that's paid once (in DrRacket), I can live with that. I'd bet program execution to be exactly as fast, but even this might be wrong if name lookups happen during compilation. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
