I think you want `syntax-local-phase-level`. As for `phase-of-enclosing-module`, it will continue to be provided by the `unstable-lib` package, but starting with the next release, it will not be provided in the main distribution.
Vincent On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 05:06:40 -0500, thomas.lynch wrote: > > A module ostensibly written for phase 0, can become phase n due to (require > (for-syntax a-module)). > > There is a module with test code that only makes sense at phase 0, but > because it is (required "test-code.rkt") inside of another module which > itself is required for syntax, or a higher module is required for syntax, it > ends up executing at phase 1 or higher and making a mess. > > One can not use the simple dodge of a (begin-for-syntax) because that is > just phase n+1. I.e. it is a relative construct. We have no idea where > phase 0 is. > > unstable/syntax has a function called "(phase-of-enclosing-module)" is this > the right way to do this? .. ah and what does 'unstable' imply here? > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
