Asumu Takikawa writes: > On 2015-09-02 08:41:21 +0200, Konrad Hinsen wrote: > > That would be great, but if that's not possible, the next-best option would > > be to document the restriction. > > I now have a pull request that should address this: > > https://github.com/plt/racket/pull/1044
Thanks! I'll try this on my code when I find some time (mainly for installing Racket from scratch). > I've only found one issue with this so far, which is that `object->vector` > can > expose the difference between an object produced from a contracted class and > a > regular object. This seems minor though. I assume that object->vector is mainly used by code analysis tools, so the difference may even be of use. But I'll leave that question to people who actually use object->vector! Konrad. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
