On Thursday, September 10, 2015 at 12:25:54 AM UTC+1, Greg Hendershott wrote: > There's http://pasterack.org/ which is awesome. Folks frequently use > it on #racket IRC. It can optionally evaluate the code, too.
I seem to have missed that it was a “racket-specific“ paste bin. Somehow I conflated it with pastebin. > However: > > 1. I don't know its long-term retention intention (or reality). > 2. I don't think it aspires to the discoverablity implied by your use case. > 3. It doesn't support revisions like say gist.github.com > > But perhaps instead of from-scratch you could help add some/all of these? If there isn’t a clash of purpose between a paste bin and a code repostory (below). > [From your post I'm guessing you'd think 1 is must-have, 2 is > nice-to-have, and 3 I'm not sure.] 1 is must-have 2 is also must-have; no reference material is useful without searchability 3 is not as necessary as “ownership” -- http://pasterack.org/pastes/31401 is a work in progress of http://pasterack.org/pastes/1055 ; I don’t want to verion control it, but I _do_ want to delete #31401. But it needs to be verifiably me that can do that. [Others might be more professional about life and want to properly version control their snippets]; I think this goes a against the spirit on anonymity of a “paste bin” Tim -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
