On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 14:42:03 +0000, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@cs.indiana.edu> wrote:
>You can see the patch here: >https://github.com/plt/racket/commit/641c56b6e95b57881b6fef846fb758ed5cd6e5a8 > >Sam On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 12:08:17 -0600, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: >At Tue, 18 Aug 2015 10:40:14 -0400, George Neuner wrote: >> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 10:07:11 -0600, Matthew Flatt >> <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: >> >> >I've pushed a repair as commit 641c56b6e9. I expect that patch would >> >apply cleanly to v6.2.1. >> >> Is it safe to assume this problem also is in 6.1.1? > >Yes. > >Just to be clear, your application would have to allocate thousands of >place channels before the leak becomes measurable. Allocating places >would also leak, since they create place channels, but a place is >heavyweight enough that I don't think you can create places fast enough >to measure the small leak. > >(Allocating thousands of place channels is a perfectly reasonable thing >to do, but most uses of places don't do that.) Thanks Matthew and Sam. George -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
