Suppose I have a macro (experiment ...) which is intended, among other things, to be composed of uses of a macro (collect ...).
For instance: (experiment (collect ...) (collect ...) ...) To my understanding, "collect" is not a literal. Can I turn the collect macro itself into a syntax class somehow? Should I instead create a dummy literal "collect" for this purpose, and then create a (collect* ...) macro? Thanks for any advice. Deren -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
