Oops. Then I'd want to change the all-from-outs to something more specific, or (preferably) change b to only provide some-fn at one level and make the requiring module be more specific.
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Alexis King <lexi.lam...@gmail.com> wrote: > Nope, that doesn’t work. If you try it, you’ll see that some-fn is still > available in phase 1. That’s because the (provide (all-from-out (submod > ".." b))) provides it as well, which is why I’ve been struggling. > > > On Jun 28, 2015, at 13:09, Benjamin Greenman <bl...@cornell.edu> wrote: > > > > No problem, just change the provides around. Maybe the problem is that > you're missing the (require (for-syntax ...)) ? > > > > (module c racket/base > > ;; Require & provide everything except `some-fun` at phase 1 > > (require (for-syntax (except-in (submod ".." b) some-fn))) > > (provide (for-syntax (all-from-out (submod ".." b)))) > > ;; Require & provide everything at phase 0 > > (require (submod ".." b)) > > (provide (all-from-out (submod ".." b)))) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
