I, for one, thought the idea of “OS” reads and writes from Get Bonus was a neat abstraction, even if it is more or less just functional reads and writes to a giant hash table. Obviously that’s more complicated than would be appropriate for big-bang, but I thought I’d bring it up anyway.
> On Jun 23, 2015, at 8:30 AM, Matthias Felleisen <matth...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > > > I have for years hoped to find time to think about 'distributing state' over > handlers in big-bang because I am perfectly aware of the scaling up > limitations. Your hashtable idea might be worth exploring. Tony and I are > also considering his actor system as a source of ideas. This may also give us > a handle at a special-purpose gc as Tony noted yesterday. But now I am way > off stuff I have done, and I don't like to discuss things that I might do so > forgive me for this much and I'll stop now -- Matthias > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
