On 4/18/2015 5:09 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
It is conceivable to grab the servlet's custodian and look at
just the cost of the servlet, but unless there are many servlets, that
will basically be the same value.
Does that work if there is just one instance of serve/servlet with a big
dispatch-rules table? I have a lot of functions that don't need
continuations and just a handful that do (mostly forward only, this
paging function is the only one currently that also needs to go backwards).
Would it make sense to separate the continued functions in a separate
instance of serve/servlet? And if so, how do I go about running
multiple instances safely? I know serve/servlet won't return until it
catches a break exception, so at least a separate thread is required ...
but do I also need to create a new custodian?
That is, if I have the structure
top-level
|_ thread
| |_ serve/servlet (2)
|
|_ serve/servlet (1)
does calling current-custodian in a continuation manager for
serve/servlet (2) return the top-level custodian or something else?
Also, will this 2nd instance catch signals from the OS and shutdown
cleanly, or do I need to explicitly create a custodian to manage it and
shut down that custodian manually when the main thread catches a signal
(i.e. when serve/servlet (1) terminates) ?
Sorry if I'm being a pain - this system level stuff is all new.
George
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
