On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Michael Wilber <g...@sneakygcr.net> wrote:
> this doesn't work in vanilla Racket > Sure, but it works without the let! For context, I ran into this issue adding types to a function originally written in continuation passing style. Switching to cons was an easy fix.
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
