Well, "relatively soon" turned out over-optimistic, but this is now merged.
Sam On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:09 AM Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@cs.indiana.edu> wrote: > I've now generalized this to be a function or a slot in the struct. > > I hope to get it merged relatively soon. > > Sam > > > > On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 3:00 PM, J. Ian Johnson <i...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > > Why is it a name per type? That seems wrong, since a function with > docstring struct should have the object-name of the function, or something > refined. The struct itself could be used for potentially every function a > user writes, rendering object-name overly vague. > > -Ian > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Sam Tobin-Hochstadt" <sa...@cs.indiana.edu> > > To: "Matthew Flatt" <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> > > Cc: "Racket Users" <users@racket-lang.org> > > Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2014 2:44:09 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern > > Subject: Re: [racket] something like a prop:object-name? > > > > This doesn't count as "soon", but I finally cleaned up my patch for > > this: https://github.com/plt/racket/pull/729 > > > > It's not as general as what Alexander envisioned, so it should > > probably be generalized. > > > > Sam > > > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt > > <sa...@cs.indiana.edu> wrote: > >> I've written 75% of a patch for this, so hopefully we'll have it soon. > >> > >> Sam > >> > >> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> > wrote: > >>> I think `prop:object-name` would be a good addition, but it doesn't > >>> exist right now. > >>> > >>> At Wed, 30 Apr 2014 16:35:06 -0400, "Alexander D. Knauth" wrote: > >>>> What do you mean? I tried it and it didn’t affect the object-name. > >>>> > >>>> And what I’m looking for is something that could be different for > different > >>>> instances of the same structure type, for example: > >>>> (struct thing (name) #:property prop:object-name (struct-field-index > name)) > >>>> > >>>> (struct proc-with-string (proc str) > >>>> #:property prop:procedure (struct-field-index proc) > >>>> #:property prop:object-name (lambda (this) > >>>> (object-name (proc-with-string-proc > this))) > >>>> #:property prop:custom-write (lambda (this out mode) > >>>> (display (proc-with-string-str this) > out))) > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Apr 30, 2014, at 9:26 AM, Stephen Chang <stch...@ccs.neu.edu> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > Does the #:extra-constructor-name keyword argument to struct do > what you're > >>>> looking for? > >>>> > > >>>> > On Apr 29, 2014 9:31 PM, "Alexander D. Knauth" < > alexan...@knauth.org> wrote: > >>>> > I’m just curious is there something like a prop:object-name that the > >>>> object-name function would use when returning the object name of a > struct with > >>>> that property? > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > ____________________ > >>>> > Racket Users list: > >>>> > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users > >>>> > >>>> ____________________ > >>>> Racket Users list: > >>>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users > >>> > >>> ____________________ > >>> Racket Users list: > >>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users > > > > ____________________ > > Racket Users list: > > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users >
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
