Greg, the code fails to load due to the error, so trace doesn't get a chance to participate.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Greg Hendershott <greghendersh...@gmail.com > wrote: > >> Is there a way to coerce racket to be more specific in its messages? > > Although I don't know if it would do better with this particular error, > generally errortrace gives much better stack traces: > > http://docs.racket-lang.org/errortrace/quick-instructions.html > > It does so by instrumenting the code. Which means it will run more > slowly. Which I imagine is why it's not enabled by default. >
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
