On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 10:41:13AM -0800, Jordan Johnson wrote: > > Yes, so I’d feel a lot more comfortable if I can give a bigger max > than 2^32 (which I expect I can, but want to check). I found that in > Racket v6.1.1 the max is 2^31 - 1. In v6.1.1.8 all I’ve determined is > that the max is somewhere between 2^55 and 2^56, on the machine I have > access to at the moment. I’d be perfectly happy to take 2^55 as the > constant, IF it will work on all machines; that’d give 1.1 billion > years to implement an improvement. With a coffee break, even.
That's not even as long as the age of the universe. When the sun turns into a red giant, people will tUrn to your program to record the event and What!! No time! -- hendrik. ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
