What you want is `with-module-reading-parameterization <http://docs.racket-lang.org/syntax/module-helpers.html?q=with-module-reading#%28def._%28%28lib._syntax%2Fmodread..rkt%29._with-module-reading-parameterization%29%29> `:
(with-module-reading-parameterization <http://docs.racket-lang.org/syntax/module-helpers.html?q=with-module-reading#%28def._%28%28lib._syntax%2Fmodread..rkt%29._with-module-reading-parameterization%29%29> (lambda () (read (open-input-port "my-file.rkt")))) On Fri Feb 20 2015 at 12:43:15 AM Thomas Gilray <thomas.gil...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to figure out how to use read-syntax on a port for an entire > .rkt file. I want to then call (expand ...) on this and get back a (begin > ...) or (module ...) form for the entire file in fully expanded form. Right > now I have three issues: > > a) I have to skip over the #lang as this is not recognized by read-syntax > itself > > b) I've needed to call read-syntax repeatedly to consume the whole file > and put each expression in a top-level begin (a pretty klugy workaround) > > c) even then, calling expand will report an error that "define" is not > itself defined. Maybe there is a version of read-syntax that will use > read-language internally in the right way but I can't find it. > > There is probably a way of doing all of this at once, and better, but I > don't know what that would be. I feel read-language is needed, but I don't > see how this would work together with read-syntax. > > Any advice or pointers would be greatly appreciated! > > -- > Tom > > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users >
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
