My racketfoo is not strong enough to provide a suggestion for a solution, but I can see the utility in what you are trying to do (at least in the way I understood your message); use a macro to wrap untyped code within a typed context.
TR provides a `with-type` to write typed code within an untyped context, so maybe there should be a feature request for something like a `with-untyped` to define an untyped region that adds type contracts at the boundary and can be used in a typed context. On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Alexis King <lexi.lam...@gmail.com> wrote: > I wrote a typed racket macro that creates an untyped submodule, then uses > require/typed to add type annotations to the bindings. This would work > great, except that it just errors out and dies. I submitted a bug report > before realizing that a bug report already existed > <http://bugs.racket-lang.org/query/?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=default&pr=14130&return_url=http://bugs.racket-lang.org/query/?database=default;debug=;State=any;ignoreclosed=Ignore%20Closed;Synopsis=local-require;multitext=;columns=State;columns=Synopsis;columns=Category;columns=Last-Modified;columns=Release;cmd=submit%20query;sortby=Number>. > There, someone suggested that it would work fine with (submod "." foo) > instead of simply using 'foo. This works! > > Except that it doesn’t work when errortrace is enabled. This behavior is > observable here: > https://gist.github.com/lexi-lambda/d0da64235e1bca59810f > > Note that it works fine using plain old require, and it also works fine > without errortrace. What is errortrace doing that breaks this specific > instance? How can I fix it? I’d really like to be able to solve this > because my macro sort of depends on it. > > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users > >
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
