Sorry. This is a typo that has always been part of the response/output documentation:
https://github.com/plt/racket/commit/944602440c4e44cec8a4a6662336989fe37b29e7 My guess is that it was copied from response/xexpr. I'll update the docs. Sorry for the inconvenience. Jay On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 4:56 PM, George Neuner <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Using Racket 6.0.1 response/output is throwing an error when I use the > #:cookies keyword: > > application: procedure does not expect an argument with given keyword > procedure: response/output > given keyword: #:cookies > arguments...: > #<procedure:temp1> > #:code 200 > #:cookies '() > #:message #"OK" > #:mime-type #"application/javascript" > #:seconds 141522071 > > Code is: > > (define (response/json obj . cookies ) > (response/output > (λ (op) (write-json obj op)) > #:code 200 > #:message #"OK" > #:seconds (current-seconds) > #:mime-type #"application/javascript" > #:cookies cookies > )) > > I get the same error with and without a list of cookies. However, it > works if I change the code to use > > #:headers (map cookie->header cookies) > > > The 6.0.1 documentation (hope the cut-n-paste renders!) indicates that > #:cookies is a valid keyword. I checked the online docs for 6.1.1 and > they still say the same: > > (response/output output [ #:code code > #:message message #:seconds seconds #:mime-type > mime-type #:headers headers #:cookies cookies]) > → response? > > output : (-> output-port? void?) code : number? = 200 message : > bytes? = #"Okay" seconds : number? = (current-seconds) mime-type : ( > or/c bytes? #f) = TEXT/HTML-MIME-TYPE headers : (listof header?) = '() > cookies : (listof cookie?) = '() > > I know that cookies are placed using headers and that there is no separate > field in the actual response, but seeing this I expected that the function > would create the appropriate header(s) for me. Obviously (map > cookie->header ...) is an easy work-around, but I'd like to know if this is > a documentation error or if I really was doing something wrong. Or > possibly prematurely - is #:cookies implemented in 6.1.x ? > > Thanks, > George > > > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users > > -- Jay McCarthy http://jeapostrophe.github.io "Wherefore, be not weary in well-doing, for ye are laying the foundation of a great work. And out of small things proceedeth that which is great." - D&C 64:33
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
