At Wed, 5 Nov 2014 03:09:06 -0500, Asumu Takikawa wrote: > > On 2014-11-04 10:32:01 -0500, Vincent St-Amour wrote: > > My hypothesis is that the `typed/racket/base` version of the executable > > brings in the entire Typed Racket implementation and its dependencies. > > It probably would be sufficient to only bring in the run-time portions > > of TR, which are smaller. > > Is it possible to make TR programs only bring in their run-time > dependencies though? > > I tried an experiment by making a module like this: > > #lang racket/base > (require (for-syntax racket/syntax)) > > Since the library `racket/syntax` is only used for compile-time, you > might expect that it won't be included via `raco exe` but it actually > is. (you can see by doing `raco exe --vv`) > > So maybe Racket cannot currently separate compile-time out for building > executables at all?
Right, I was suggesting a possible change to `raco exe` that may solve the problem. I don't know whether it's possible / a good idea, though. Vincent ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
