Sam Tobin-Hochstadt writes: > > This suggests that if I want my single-form module to be handled exactly > > like a multi-form module, my single form must expand to something else > > than #%plain-module-begin. Fine. But who or what decides what my single > > form becomes when it is "partially expanded in a module-begin context" ? > > This always happens in a single-form module. The macro system > partially-expands the macro to see if it turns into a version of > #%module-begin.
Fine, but how? Where are the rules that lead to (displayln (foo 42)) being partially expanded to (#%plain-module-begin ...) Are they part of the language definition? More specifically, I am looking for a way to override them. Konrad. ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
